VWO vs EEM: Differences, Fees and Returns

VWO is cheaper: it charges 0.06% a year against 0.72% for EEM. That is €66 less a year per 10,000 invested; over a plan of 10,000 up front plus 200 a month for 30 years, the accumulated cost gap comes to about €43,368.

They do not track the same thing: VWO follows the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index and EEM the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Any difference in returns will come mainly from that exposure, not from the fee.

Over the last 10 years, EEM returned 8.62% a year against 8.00% for VWO. That is past performance and may not repeat.

Head-to-head comparison

Head-to-head comparison
VWOEEM
NameVanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETFiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
ProviderVanguardBlackRock
IndexFTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion IndexMSCI Emerging Markets Index
TER0.06%0.72%
TypeETFETF
DomicileUnited StatesUnited States
DividendsDistributingDistributing
Launch dateMarch 4, 2005April 7, 2003
Fund size$168B$31B
ISINβ€”β€”
Available to EU retail investorsNoNo
Tax-free switch (Spain)NoNo

Historical returns: VWO vs EEM (Aug 2016 – Aug 2026)

Aug 2016Aug 2026$23,329
VWOEEM

10,000 invested in Aug 2016 would be worth $21,592 in VWO and $22,855 in EEM today.

Statistics for the period
VWOEEM
Annualised return8.00%8.62%
Total return115.92%128.55%
Annual volatility15.50%17.22%
Maximum drawdown-31.86%-36.52%
Monthly correlation0.98

Calendar-year returns

Calendar-year returns
YearVWOEEM
2026*12.71%23.12%
202525.58%33.98%
202410.58%6.50%
20239.27%8.99%
2022-17.99%-20.56%
20211.30%-3.62%
202015.19%17.03%
201920.76%18.20%
2018-14.77%-15.31%
201731.48%37.28%

* Current year, to Aug 2026.

Month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and net of fund costs. Broker fees and taxes are not included. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Keep researching

Other comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions