VB vs IWM: Differences, Fees and Returns

VB is cheaper: it charges 0.03% a year against 0.19% for IWM. That is €16 less a year per 10,000 invested; over a plan of 10,000 up front plus 200 a month for 30 years, the accumulated cost gap comes to about €11,263.

They do not track the same thing: VB follows the CRSP US Small Cap Index and IWM the Russell 2000 Index. Any difference in returns will come mainly from that exposure, not from the fee.

Over the last 10 years, VB returned 10.99% a year against 10.46% for IWM. That is past performance and may not repeat.

Head-to-head comparison

Head-to-head comparison
VBIWM
NameVanguard Small-Cap ETFiShares Russell 2000 ETF
ProviderVanguardBlackRock
IndexCRSP US Small Cap IndexRussell 2000 Index
TER0.03%0.19%
TypeETFETF
DomicileUnited StatesUnited States
DividendsDistributingDistributing
Launch dateJanuary 26, 2004May 22, 2000
Fund size$185B$81B
ISINβ€”β€”
Available to EU retail investorsNoNo
Tax-free switch (Spain)NoNo

Historical returns: VB vs IWM (Aug 2016 – Aug 2026)

Aug 2016Aug 2026$28,745
VBIWM

10,000 invested in Aug 2016 would be worth $28,368 in VB and $27,049 in IWM today.

Statistics for the period
VBIWM
Annualised return10.99%10.46%
Total return183.68%170.49%
Annual volatility19.33%20.83%
Maximum drawdown-30.07%-32.29%
Monthly correlation0.98

Calendar-year returns

Calendar-year returns
YearVBIWM
2026*16.76%19.90%
20258.87%12.66%
202414.17%11.39%
202318.23%16.84%
2022-17.50%-20.48%
202117.56%14.54%
202019.16%20.03%
201927.32%25.39%
2018-9.33%-11.11%
201716.26%14.59%

* Current year, to Aug 2026.

Month-end closing prices adjusted for dividends and net of fund costs. Broker fees and taxes are not included. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Keep researching

Frequently Asked Questions