BND vs BNDX: Differences, Fees and Returns
BND is cheaper: it charges 0.03% a year against 0.07% for BNDX. That is €4 less a year per 10,000 invested; over a plan of 10,000 up front plus 200 a month for 30 years, the accumulated cost gap comes to about €2,858.
They do not track the same thing: BND follows the Bloomberg US Aggregate Float Adjusted Index and BNDX the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index. Any difference in returns will come mainly from that exposure, not from the fee.
Head-to-head comparison
| BND | BNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Vanguard Total International Bond ETF |
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Index | Bloomberg US Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index |
| TER | 0.03% | 0.07% |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Domicile | United States | United States |
| Dividends | Distributing | Distributing |
| Launch date | April 3, 2007 | May 31, 2013 |
| Fund size | $399B | $35B+ |
| ISIN | — | — |
| Available to EU retail investors | No | No |
| Tax-free switch (Spain) | No | No |
Keep researching
Other comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
BND is cheaper: it charges 0.03% a year against 0.07% for BNDX. That is €4 less a year per 10,000 invested; over a plan of 10,000 up front plus 200 a month for 30 years, the accumulated cost gap comes to about €2,858. They do not track the same thing: BND follows the Bloomberg US Aggregate Float Adjusted Index and BNDX the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index. Any difference in returns will come mainly from that exposure, not from the fee.
BND (ETF) tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Float Adjusted Index with a 0.03% TER; BNDX (ETF) tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index with a 0.07% TER.
Generally not as a retail client: they are US-domiciled ETFs without the key information document EU PRIIPs rules require. Look for their UCITS equivalents in our list of funds for Europe.